SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY
LEGAL DEFINITION
Sexual harassment of a
student, an employee, or any
other person in the college is
unacceptable, impermissible,
intolerable, and punishable
under law. It is also
unlawful to retaliate against
anyone for filing a complaint
of sexual harassment.
Sexual harassment is a form of
sex discrimination. It occurs
in a variety of situations
that share a common element:
the inappropriate introduction
of sexual activities or
comments into the work or
learning environment. There
are two types of sexual
harassment.
TYPES OF HARASSMENT
Quid pro quo
harassment is defined in
Massachusetts General Law,
Chapter 151 B as: sexual
advances, requests for sexual
favors, verbal or physical
conduct of a sexual nature
when submission to or
rejection of such advances,
requests or conduct is made
either explicitly or
implicitly as a term or
condition of employment or as
a basis for
academic/employment
decisions. Quid pro quo
harassment occurs when an
employee/instructor with
authority or control over the
terms and conditions of
another employee’s work or a
student’s academic performance
offers him/her a benefit or
advantage in exchange for
sexual favors or
gratification. Conversely, if
a student/employee is denied
an academic/work benefit or
advantage due to his/her
refusal to respond to, or
rejection of, requests for
sexual favors or
gratification, then he/she was
subjected to quid pro quo
harassment.
The second form of sexual
harassment is hostile
classroom/work environment
harassment, of which is
defined in Chapter 151B as:
sexual advances, requests for
sexual favors, and other
verbal or physical conduct of
a sexual nature…such advances,
requests or conduct have the
purpose or effect of
unreasonably interfering with
an individual’s classroom/work
performance by creating an
intimidating, hostile,
humiliating or sexually
offensive academic/work
environment.
The law does not prescribe all
conduct of a sexual nature.
Only unsolicited and unwelcome
conduct may create a hostile
work environment.
EXAMPLES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT
For general purposes, sexual
harassment may be described as
unwelcome advances, requests
for sexual favors, and other
physical conduct and
expressive behavior of a
sexual nature when: (1)
submission to such conduct is
made either explicitly or
implicitly a term or condition
of an individual’s employment
or education; (2) submission
to or rejection of such
conduct by an individual is
used as the basis for academic
or employment decisions
affecting that individual; or
(3) such conduct has the
purpose or effect of
substantially interfering with
an individual’s academic or
professional performance
and/or creating an
intimidating, hostile, or
demeaning employment or
educational environment.
Under these definitions,
direct or implied requests by
an instructor/supervisor for
sexual favors in exchange for
actual or promised
academic/job benefits such as
favorable grades, reviews,
salary increases, promotions,
increased benefits, or
continued employment
constitutes sexual harassment.
The legal definition of sexual
harassment is broad and in
addition to the examples
previously stated, other
sexually oriented conduct,
whether it is intended or not,
that is unwelcome and has the
effect of creating a work
place/academic environment
that is hostile, offensive,
intimidating, or humiliating
to male or female workers, may
also constitute sexual
harassment. While it is not
possible to list all those
additional circumstances that
may constitute sexual
harassment, the following are
some examples of conduct,
which, if unwelcome, may
constitute sexual harassment
depending upon the totality of
the circumstances including
the severity of the conduct
and its pervasiveness:
-
Unwelcome sexual advances -
whether they involve
physical touching or not;
-
Dissemination of sexually
explicit voice mail, e-mail,
graphics, downloaded
material or websites;
-
Sexual epithets, jokes,
written or oral references
to sexual conduct, gossip
regarding one’s sex life,
comments on an individual’s
body, comments about an
individual’s sexual
activity, deficiencies, or
prowess;
-
Displaying sexually
suggestive objects,
pictures, cartoons;
-
Unwelcome leering,
whistling, brushing against
the body, sexual gestures,
suggestive or insulting
comments;
-
Inquiries into one’s sexual
experiences; and,
-
Discussion of one’s sexual
activities.
CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIPS
Under this policy, consenting
romantic and sexual
relationships between faculty
and student, librarian and
student, administrator and
student, classified staff
member and student, or
supervisor and employee are
deemed unprofessional.
Because such relationships
interfere with or impair
required professional
responsibilities and
relationships, they are looked
upon with disfavor and
strongly discouraged by this
policy.
Faculty, librarians,
administrators, classified
staff members, and supervisors
are warned against the dangers
of apparently consensual
relationships. A faculty
member, librarian,
administrator, or classified
staff member who enters into a
romantic or sexual
relationship with an employee
where a power differential
exists, must realize that, if
a charge of sexual harassment
is subsequently lodged, it
will be exceedingly difficult
to disprove the claim on the
grounds of mutual consent.
Because that is so, it should
be understood that
relationships of this kind
pose serious professional
risks to any who enter into
them.
LEGAL REFERENCES
Sexual harassment is expressly
forbidden by federal and state
regulations and action by the
federal government has
established that such
behaviors are actionable under
the provisions of Title VII of
the 1964 Civil Rights Act and
the Civil Rights Act of 1991,
the provisions of Title IX of
the 1972 Educational
Amendments and under
Massachusetts General Law,
Chapter 151B, Sections 3A,
4(1), and 16A.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
In
keeping with these
regulations, a concerted
effort will be made to protect
employees, students, and
others from sexual harassment
as defined. If an incidence
should arise, retaliation is
unlawful against the victim or
those who cooperate in the
investigation of a sexual
harassment complaint. The
final authority and ultimate
responsibility for the
prevention of sexual
harassment will rest with the
President. The President will
take all reasonable measures
to prevent sexual harassment
and will act promptly to
investigate the alleged
harassment and to effect
remedy when an allegation is
determined to be valid.
However, the Director of Human
Resources/Affirmative Action
Officer will have the
responsibility for the overall
development, administration,
and monitoring of all
programs, policies,
procedures, and regulations
related to sexual harassment.
Complaints about sexual
harassment should be
communicated orally or
registered formally with the
Director of Human
Resources/Affirmative Action
Officer, extension 4530.
POLICY DISSEMINATION
The College’s policies and
complaint procedures on sexual
harassment are well publicized
to students and employees;
these policies and procedures
are detailed in student
handbooks and employee
pamphlets. All employees will
be given a copy of the College
policy on sexual harassment on
or before November 15th, on an
annual basis. New employees
will receive a copy at the
onset of their employment. In
addition to formal procedures,
the College shall insure that
appropriate opportunities are
available to students and
employees to obtain counseling
concerning their rights under
the law and effective means of
informally resolving
grievances.
COMPLAINT PROCESS
When employees or students
feel their equal opportunity
rights have been breached, the
complaint process is a
mechanism for resolution. When
a complaint is filed, it will
be promptly investigated in a
fair and expeditious manner. A
neutral investigation will be
conducted in such a way as to
maintain confidentiality to
the extent practicable under
the circumstances. The
investigation will include a
private interview with the
person filing the complaint,
with any witnesses, and with
the person alleged to have
committed the sexual
harassment. When the
investigation is completed to
the extent appropriate, the
person filing the complaint
and the person alleged to have
committed the conduct will be
informed of the results of the
investigation. If it is
determined that inappropriate
conduct occurred, prompt
action to eliminate the
offending conduct will occur,
and where appropriate,
disciplinary action will be
imposed.
The informal process will
encourage the affected person
to discuss the concern or
breach with any involved
College official who may be
helpful in resolving the
matter. The College official
may be the Human Resources
Director/Affirmative Action
Officer and/or her designee,
an Assistant/Associate Dean, a
counselor, a supervisor, or
any other official who might
help the affected person with
an informal resolution. The
purpose of the informal
grievance process is to allow
for misunderstandings to be
aired and resolved and to
provide an opportunity for the
aggrieved person and the
alleged perpetrator to attempt
to resolve the concern prior
to the formal grievance
process.
FORMAL COMPLAINT PROCESS
Any employee or student, who
believes that the College’s
Affirmative Action/Equal
Employment Opportunity
Commission (AA/EEOC) Policy
has been breached in its
application to him/her, may
institute a formal complaint.
The formal complaint procedure
for employees contains four
steps, all of which are listed
in the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts Community
College Affirmative Action
Plan. The Affirmative Action
Plan is available in the Human
Resources office, extension
4530. Students may also seek
guidance, advice and
assistance for the Dean of
Academic and Student Affairs,
extension 4596, or a designee
thereof.
POSSIBLE COMPLAINT PENALTIES
If
it is determined that
inappropriate conduct has been
committed by an employee or
student, appropriate action
will be taken. Such action may
range from counseling to
termination from employment or
student status, and may
include such other forms of
disciplinary action as deemed
appropriate under the
circumstances. In addition to
the College’s grievance
process, if an employee or
student has been subjected to
sexual harassment, a formal
complaint may be filed with
either or both of the
government agencies listed at
the end of this notice.
Using the College’s informal
or formal complaint processes
does not prohibit an employee
or student from filing a
complaint with these agencies.
Each of the agencies has a
deadline for filing claims:
EEOC – 180 or 300 days
depending on the applicable
period; MCAD - 300 days from
the date of the most recent
incident.
FEDERAL and STATE AGENCIES
1. The United States Equal
Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC)
John F. Kennedy Federal
Building
Room 475
Government Center
Boston, MA 02203
(617) 565-3200 or (800)
669-4000
2. The Massachusetts
Commission Against
Discrimination (MCAD)
Boston Office:
One Ashburton Place-Room 601
Boston, MA 02108
(617) 994-6000
|